You're viewing a single thread.
Lucidlethargy @sh.itjust.works Genera?
32 0 Replyfeedum_sneedson @lemmy.world Genre.
29 0 Replyproti @lemmy.world it's very much ai,
generation?7 2 ReplyKrauerking @lemy.lol Have, you lost Ted?
1 0 ReplyViking_Hippie @lemmy.world Pretty sure that's Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
1 0 Replycelsiustimeline @lemmy.dbzer0.com Permanently Deleted
3 1 ReplyTropicalDingdong @lemmy.world nope. it's the plural.
2 7 ReplyBluesF @lemmy.world The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus... Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
5 0 ReplyTropicalDingdong @lemmy.world Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new "species" of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
1 1 ReplyBluesF @lemmy.world Still wrong because they are refering to an individual "species" of image, so it would be genus not genera.
1 0 Reply
deadbeef79000 @lemmy.nz `Plural of genre. Still should have been singular "genre" though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.I was thinking of "genus".
6 11 ReplyEthalis @jlai.lu I think the word genre comes directly from the french word ("genre", meaning "type"), which in the plural form is "genres". I don't think "genera" means anything, it's probably a typo
17 0 Replygrue @lemmy.world "Genera" is a plural form of "genus" (i.e. also "type," but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
17 1 Replydeadbeef79000 @lemmy.nz Derp, that's what I was thinking of.
1 0 Reply
Krauerking @lemy.lol They apparently couldn't be bothered to to type out
Generated?
1 0 Reply
ColeSloth @discuss.tchncs.de Yeah....no it isn't.
9 0 Reply