Judge orders hearing to review Onion’s purchase of Alex Jones’s InfoWars
Judge orders hearing to review Onion’s purchase of Alex Jones’s InfoWars
Judge to audit if conspiracy theorist’s bankruptcy auction was fair, which could delay buying process for satire site
“We’re all going to an evidentiary hearing and I’m going to figure out exactly what happened,” the judge, Christopher Lopez, said in an emergency hearing on Thursday afternoon. “No one should feel comfortable with the results of this auction.”
Oh bullshit.
You're viewing a single thread.
-
Is this not the capitalist dystopia they wanted? It was an auction, The Onion was the highest bidder, and the discussion should stop there, right?
-
"The Onion was the highest bidder[...]"
Literally the point of the suit is that The Onion was not the highest bidder. From the article:
The exact bid amount offered by the Onion for InfoWars remains unknown, but it has been reported it was lower than First United American’s bid of $3.5m.
The victims of Jones decided it was better to get less money and not allow the brand to go to one of his allies to continue the usual operations. They are saying that even though they effectively own the brand, that they don't have the right to choose who it's sold to.
There is only one way this should go, but...
-
But you see, the judge agrees politically with the former content of Info Wars. You should learn to be more sensitive of the feelings of egoist judges! Their job is soooo hard being he backbone of American democracy.
-
-
The Onions winning bid was lower than the other bid.
-
The other bid wouldn't be an arm's-length transaction because that entity does business with Alex Jones
-
Not after 8 families opted to take a smaller cut of the sale.
-
So what?
-
Auctions are contracts, most of them are beholden to the highest bidder. I am guessing thr lawyers are either being paid to make media waves, or they didn't read the terms of the auction.
-
The auction house specified that they will not necessarily accept only the highest bid
-
-
So that's why the judge is taking a closer look at it.
-
The trustee and auction house are allowed to accept lower bids. Especially ones that make the creditors more whole, which this one does. So no that’s not why
-
Ok. Well, feel free to tell everyone why since you seem to know so much.
-
just couldn't resist making yourself a clown
-
Jones is raising a stink because he feels like the bidding process was cut short and the rules were changed once his bid was the clear winner. He’s a moron and he’s wrong and he’s also not allowed to bid, so his bid by proxy will hopefully be caught and punished
-
Im glad you were there. But you should have told the New York Times, the AP, and the Guardian instead of us.
-
You asked for more info, they provided it, and then you were rude to them. Is everything ok?
-
Maybe you should have read up on the story before running your mouth. Could have saved yourself a lot of embarrassment by just saying “oh thanks I didn’t know” but here we are I guess
-
-
-
-
-
Sellers have a right to accept lower bids, or to accept non-monetary "value" and it happens literally every day in real estate.
What I don't know is whether the nature of the auction actually changes things.
-
-
-
-