Linux @lemmy.ml OsrsNeedsF2P @lemmy.ml 1y ago

Windows 11 vs Linux supported HW

489

You're viewing a single thread.

489 comments

I could never go back to Windows, after having tasted the freedom of Linux.
- Linux has its flaws, but so does Windows. And for me, the flaws in Windows became much more annoying than the ones in Linux. Game compatibility was the main factor that kept me backt from using it on a desktop, and that's a non issue nowadays.
  
  Game compatibility
  
  Steam+Proton is pretty impressive. I can play Baldur's Gate 3 on my Thelio. Does get a little toasty, though ....
  
  Why would you buy that? Overpriced and with that case it's no wonder that things get toasty. There's like fuck all for airflow. If you want a case with wood accents, there's the North from Fractal Design, which have great airflow thanks to their open fronts.
  
  I’m so happy something like this exists. I hate RGB and love wood on my electronics. Think I’m gonna pick one of these up.
  
  I didn't buy it for a gaming machine. I was pleasantly surprised that a fancy new Windows game ran on it at all!
  
  I thought you were just being a dick but then I checked out the North from Fractal Design and wow it’s beautiful!
  
  I'm just calling out those idiotic cases that completely choke your hardware of air. You want an open front (or similar depending on the form factor) to get a bunch of silent fans in to let your system breath properly. Bad airflow will just cause your temps to rise, which also severely increases the noise.
  
  Yeah I mean you’re probably right. I think people just downvoted to hell because of how you phrased it.
  
  At least not on kbin (18 vs 0).
  
  Thermaltake coreV21 has entered the chat. https://youtu.be/xwOL5QYxJD4
  
  Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/xwOL5QYxJD4
  
  Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
  
  I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
  
  Cool, thanks
  
  I don't see any wood on that. Personally I had bad experiences with TT's quality too, but that was admittedly a long time ago with the Shark.
  
  Yeah I just meant for 200mm front fan airflow, plus all the fan options on top, sides back. But for wood I would grab a System76 Thelio.
  
  Why the hell would you get that, especially over the Nord? That doesn't make any sense.
  
  Designed, built and materials sourced in the USA, and high attential to details. Their own back plane for SATA connections and custom board for controlling thermals. All open sources designs. https://imgur.com/gallery/UfVBDWI
  
  Because it's open source i.e. fully upgradable and repairable, and the mission behind the company is something I would want to support.
  
  It's a prebuilt company that doesn't use proprietary garbage to force each and every customer to buy an entire new system when their original purchase starts to become obsolete.
  
  I don't own anything from system76, I've built my own my whole life, but I still believe prebuilts should be for people who can't build their own, not a timeless and somehow socially acceptable way to scam your customer and still have them come back for more
  
  Are there prebuilt desktop PCs that aren’t? I have personally yet to see one, even though I build my own. Maybe some small form-factor office rigs would be a hassle, but those are not really marketed to usecases where upgrading makes much sense anyway,
  
  That doesn't make sense. Many hardware stores offer an assembly of your hand picked hardware, which gives you 100% control over the components and actually fair prices, as well as the option to use a more sensible case. Of course it costs a bit extra to let them do that and you have to buy everything in one store, which might be more expensive than spreading it out, but it is still better than 90% of those prebuilt systems.
  And nothing there is open source, you can install Linux on any computer you want, regardless of where it came from. They just save the Windows license costs.
  
  Flaws I didn't pay for piss me off a lot less.
  
  While that's certainly also part of it, I would still stand by my opinion even if Windows was completely free.
  
  Raise your hand if you ever paid for that hot chunk
  
  I consider myself forced to pay for it every time I buy a laptop whose price has to include Microsoft's cut off the action.
  
  You are not forced, plenty of manufacturers offer FreeDOS variants for so many years, just support them instead.
  
  I bought myself a copy of NT 4.0 back in the day.
  
  I'm still dualbooting Windows to play games with a controller until I can get off my ass and buy a USB hub. Reason being that the Xbox Series controllers has issues with my mobo's Bluetooth chipset, even when updating the firmware. Bluetooth support is particularly inconsistent with these.
  
  But outside of the odd app that needs Windows (and I can just boot a VM for that), Linux has been really good on the desktop.
  
  I invested in an Icy Box IB-AC6110 powered 10 port usb hub a while ago too, but it is more for additional controllers, specifically joysticks and the likes. Mainboards just don't have enough USB ports for all that. Dual sticks or a hotas? Two gone. Maybe some pedals? Now it is 3. How about a camera and a head tracker? Well, 4-5 depending on your product solution. Defo gives me some peace of mind to be good on USB ports.
  
  yeah, thankfully I can go a bit more basic than that, I just need to figure out what hub, or even cable, I wanna get.
  
  I have been using this hub. Works fine in Linux and windows.
  
  https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0871ZHCKK?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_mob_b_asin_title
  
  I also use this usb dongle for my Xbox controller. It works fine in Linux. I really should try playing a few games on Linux.
  
  https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0785SFKYF?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_mob_b_asin_title
  
  For me it's the basic things that drive me crazy in Windows: the Start menu doesn't work half of the time, and it shows web results above the program you want to run. File operations are slow and the File Explorer crashes a lot. Application windows constantly steal focus from the one I'm typing in, leading to passwords being typed into code, documents, web browsers or other unsafe places. Background indexing is constant and eats up CPU, and the file search still takes forever despite all this indexing.
  
  These are all basic things that Microsoft has had decades to get working, and they're all still broken. Microsoft always seem to be paying attention to anything but the quality of the user's experience.
  
  By contrast, Linux is just relaxing.
  
  Man that MS indexing is so terrible. I shut it off because it was robbing my system when trying to work, and as you said it is slow anyway. Compared to GNOME desktop where the indexing is invisible to user, I hit the Suoer key type a few letters it instantly shows me results as you would expect indexing to work.
  
  I don't understand how Microsoft manage to make it so bad. What kind of index is it building that it can be so slow?
  
  Asking the real questions
  
  Mine is VST’s and games. Never had much luck using a vst bridge/wine, so i just went back to windows.
  
  and that's a non issue nowadays.
  
  Again, this community is delusional lol. If you consider only about 5% of Steam games being Linux-friendly these days as "a non issue nowadays," I'd hate to see your game library.
  
  I game on linux regularly, primarily thanks to Valve. In the last 2 months steam lists 11 different games I've "Played Recently".
  
  7 worked flawlessly (Baldur's Gate 3, Destroy All Humans!, Divinity: Original Sin 2, Besiege, Deep Rock Galactic, Shotgun King, Call of Cthulhu)
  
  1 the native linux version doesn't work, but the windows version works perfectly (Northgard)
  
  1 didn't initially work, but worked a month later after proton was updated. (Grounded)
  
  1 I had to choose an older version of Proton (due to the external launcher breaking things), but with enough performance hitching during cutscenes that I chose to just play it on windows (Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order)
  
  1 I couldn't get to work, but I honestly don't know if it's a linux issue because the game's discussion forums are full of people saying the game is riddled with game breaking bugs on windows (The Sinking City)
  
  I've been gaming on linux for a couple of years now, over that time I've put many hours into WoW, Sea of Thieves, Rimworld, Golf with your Friends, Core Keeper, Outer Wilds, and dozens more without any issues at all. 90%+ of the time the game starts up and just works.
  
  I'm just one datapoint, but yeah, Linux as a gaming platform is totally viable for me these days.
  
  Also, protondb lists 19% Verified and 16% Playable, so your 5% number is just demonstrably wrong.
  
  Cheers.
  
  I had to choose an older version of Proton
  
  Which in turn caused the performance problems. Fast shader compilation extensions are available only on Proton 8 and newer.
  
  Not sure why you're getting down voted, you're totally right. I wish I could have gotten it running on current proton as the recent performance updates are massive. Alas, EA Play ruined it. I found a GitHub issue for it and gave as much data as I could to help debug it.
  
  Side note, when I ran the game on windows, EA Play was not only installed, but automatically configured to launch on startup. I just can't imagine an app ever doing that to me on Linux.
  
  If you consider only about 5% of Steam games being Linux-friendly these days
  
  No matter how you twist and turn things, this is just flat out wrong..
  
  Survey says...No.
  
  The only games that don't work are essentially the ones using DRM/anticheat implementations that don't support multiple platforms. Meaning more like 75% of all Windows titles work under Linux just fine.
  
  Most of what you are missing out on are games that require some form of anti cheat. Most other stuff just runs. Most new triple A games just run these days.
  
  Again, this community is delusional lol. If you consider only about 5% of Steam games being Linux-friendly these days as “a non issue nowadays,” I’d hate to see your game library.
  
  Speaking of delusional. You don't seem to have a whole lot of ideas about Linux gaming if you truly believe this ignorant nonsense.
  
  79% of my library has a Silver or higher rating on ProtonDB, 65% are Gold or Platinum rated. For the Top 100 in Steam it's even better with 89% Silver+ and 79% Gold+. Of the Top 1000 Steam games it is 87% Silver+ and 75% Gold+. Even if we look at the entire Steam catalog we have 13% & 11% respectively, and that's only so low because there's literally just no reports. Only 1% of the titles are considered to be "Borked", another 1% are Bronze rated.
  You can check the data for yourself here: https://www.protondb.com/
  And again, that's just Steam and what has been tested by people. Most titles just run, others require minimal tweaking, some require a little tinkering.
  
  I'm curious what the number is excluding top games with DRM or anti cheat incompatibility
  
  DRM isn't really an issue. The main one that's used nowadays is Denuvo and that has no issues with Linux. Anticheat usually only for competitive games, which I personally don't give a damn. Other multiplayer games and their anticheat work fine, since they aren't on a kernel level type rootkit.
- I always see people say this but does no one here use professional apps like solidworks or revit? Are there good Linux alternatives? I’d switch to Linux but I need solidworks for work I do.
  
  Windows is the defacto standard for desktop PCs for a reason. In a corporate setting it's kind of the ideal.
  
  Because of the sheer number of users, most software is built with Windows in mind and therefore has the most support. It's pretty rare that you find an application that doesn't have a Windows build available.
  
  On top of that tools like Active Directory, and group policy makes managing thousands of machines at scale a reasonably simple affair.
  
  Microsoft is a corporation rather than a community so you can always expect their main goals to be profit-driven and that comes with some nasty baggage, but it's not enough that it's easy for professionals to make the switch.
  
  Linux has made lightspeed progress over the last decade, especially with Proton making games mostly work cross platform, but outside of specialist use cases, the vast majority of business PCs and by extension home PCs will be running Windows for the foreseeable future.
  
  The popularity of Windows is largely due to the fact it's pre installed on most PC's when you buy them, people literally think Windows 'is the computer'. Such popularity has little to do with Windows being a great OS. In many ways Windows is like McDonalds: It's not the best, it's not the worst, it just fills that hump in the bell curve.
  
  Due to the fact Linux has no marketing department, it's unlikely this will ever change.
  
  Windows comes pre-installed on PCs when you buy them because it's what people are generally comfortable using, because it's what they use at work too.
  
  And Windows is used on business PCs largely because of how manageable they are at scale. Windows is expensive. Like, really expensive. If you have 1000 PCs that have Windows and Office E3, assuming a bulk discount, that's an up front cost of ~$200000 with the subscription costing an additional ~$20000/month. If it was feasible for business to change to a free alternative, I guarantee they would've done so.
  
  You're right in that that Windows is not some super great OS, but it does some things way better than anything else that make it an ideal choice for business use.
  
  No, Windows comes preinstalled on most PC's due to clever marketing. As stated, it's more a case of people thinking Windows is the computer as opposed to any form of comfort regarding a fragmented touch/desktop UI making poor use of screen real estate.
  
  I come across a number of Mom and Dad, Grandma and Grandpa types that outright struggle with Windows; the device they feel comfortable with is the iPad.
  
  No, Windows comes preinstalled on most PC’s due to clever marketing
  
  I'd say it comes preinstalled because Microsoft has threatened OEMs to forbid Windows installations if they sell computers with Linux preinstalled.
  
  The possibility does exist. I think the Adobe CC hasn't been released under Linux for a similar reason, as Microsoft and Apple know that should Linux get the Adobe CC, people will flock to Linux.
  
  A number of years back Adobe accidentally released a slide showing the Adobe CC running under Ubuntu, but strangely the product was never released on the platform.
  
  And Windows is used on business PCs largely because of how manageable they are at scale.
  
  ... Linux being manageable at scale is kind of the reason why Linux is the standard for servers. Many enterprises run Linux workstation distros, and they can be managed at scale just fine, it's just different tooling. You can deploy a Linux desktop OS with Ansible as easily as a Linux server.
  
  You can replace pretty much the entire Office suite with Nextcloud and OnlyOffice, both of which can be easily hosted on-prem, for a fraction of the cost of paying MS for roughly the same thing on their awful infrastructure.
  
  If it was feasible for business to change to a free alternative, I guarantee they would've done so.
  
  They have. Just because you haven't heard about it doesn't mean it isn't happening. It's pretty easy (and inexpensive) these days to run Linux desktop OSes like RHEL, Debian or Ubuntu on a VM running on Proxmox or OpenShift, complete with multiple monitor support and GPU. Hell, you can even run a Windows VM if you want. All you need is a system (like a thin client) with enough grunt to run a browser, and enough ports to handle multiple monitors and USB accessories.
  
  And businesses aren't interested in "free", they're interested in support, which they are willing to pay for. This is how companies like Ubuntu, Red Hat and SUSE make their money. The OS is free, but you can pay for professional support.
  
  I work in software and I haven’t touched windows in a very long time. Even back whenever I worked on FPGA development all of that software ram on Linux, so I think you’ll find that this is very field dependent.
  
  Closest thing I use to a professional app is DaVinci Resolve Studio on a distribution that is not officially supported by Blackmagic. Not only does Resolve Studio work perfectly, I am able to use Blackmagic hardware (Intensity Pro 4k, Speed Editor) without having to mess around with settings, config files, permissions, packages, etc.
  
  The caveat here is the initial setup: I use an AMD GPU, and it’s a bit of a pain to get the free and licensed versions of Resolve working with those under Linux. However, once that’s out of the way, it’s completely seamless.
  
  As for CAD…yeah that’s where everything falls over. There are tons of FOSS alternatives out there but I have yet to see any of them in a professional setting. Even Fusion360 is hit or miss under Wine, I spun up a Windows VM just to use that for my 3D printer tinkering.
  
  Onshape web based CAD from former SW employees. or if work is paying licenses you can run Siemens NX12 on linux (REL, SUSE, or OpenSUSE)
  
  I guess I'm one of the lucky ones. I'm a web developer and everything I need has been cross-platform for a LONG time. I used to need things like Office and Photoshop but Figma has become the new standard for sending mockups, and everything can read Office docs, which is all a coder like me is expected to do.
  
  Realistically though, a lot of professionals can't even consider Linux because their vendors won't touch it.
  
  Idk is it CAD software? I know there are webapps for that now
- Windows with WSL became a lot better to what Windows used to be but with the TPM requirement Win11 became factually less compatible that modern Linux (at least without fiddling to override that requirement).
  
  And even WSL is essentially just a Linux VM.

489 comments