I'd like to see fusion power (or some other good power source) become a thing. It'd be nice to live in a society where energy usage was basically safe and free.
If we're being unrealistic, easy access to ftl spacecraft for everyone would be nice. Exploring the galaxy sounds fun.
What's funny is that we DO have access to fairly clean energy already! Nuclear and renewables (not as much solar, until we solve the rare earth metals problem) are pretty darn clean. I mean... have you looked up Thoroum reactors? Those things are really neat, much safer and better for the environment, etc., but came just a bit too late combined with the nuclear scare.
Lab-grown meat that is both indistinguishable from animal-grown and is cheaper. Bonus points if they can make bacon have 100% of our daily vitamins and minerals.
Evidence of life elsewhere in the universe. It would be so cool. I just hope its far enough we cant get there and fuck everything up for them (or that they cant do the same to us)
Room temperature superconductors. Not for any of the particular uses per se, but just because the world would go nuts and it would be interesting to see.
The previous poster spoke about defeating aging, not death.
I mean if we kept the same lifespan as we have today, but everyone basically stopped aging at 35, you keep the energy and clarity of mind all throughout your life, but still die at 82 or whatever, I'd call that a win.
I think the "promise" of fusion is a huge misunderstanding.
I mean we already have a nearly infinite source of clean energy, it's called fission. The only difference between fission and fusion is that fusion will be much more expensive.
If you want a truly unlimited source of energy, we have those too, they're wind and solar.
Seriously though, the expectations for fusion are completely rediculous, when we finally do get it working, it will be the most expensive form of energy ever concieved. If the reactors use the standard method of generating energy, heat capture to run a turbine, it will also require enormous amounts of beryllium as part of the "blanket" around the reactor. How much beryllium will be needed? In the whole world, we probably have enough beryllium for 4 grid scale reactors, the cost of which would be astronomical.
Here's the worst part, over time those blankets would absorb neutrons, the materials would degrade and eventually the now radioactive blanket would have to be disposed of and replaced.
The tldr is this - tokamak and stellerator style fusion reactors work great in theory, they will probably successfully make sustainable fusion reactions quite soon. But they may never generate electricity in practice, they're a logistical and economical nightmare.
I do think fusion could make a fantastic spacecraft engine however, I expect that will be a huge application.
Large scale terraforming. We're gonna need it here on Earth if we don't get climate change under control... and we're not gonna get climate change under control the easy way cuz it's not profitable.
But if we do get a hold on planet-scale, controlled climate manipulation here, that'll give us a gold mine of data for extraterrestrial use.
Fully augmented reality. Travel anywhere you can read the signs, and understand the language through subtitles and or earbuds.
Non-fixed precision robotics. Basically give a pair of robot arms a piece of wood and a dremel and it can make whatever shape, but for any tool/material.
A decentralized currency that is actually useful as currency.
A rental car that picks me up at the airport, and that I can just abandon when I’m done. I don’t mind driving I just don’t want to bother with the shuttles and parking.
Food delivery drones owned by the restaurant.
Cellular data everywhere (like starlink is working on). Ability to order an air drop of like 10 kg of food/supplies anywhere within ~200 miles of a city.
Cure for psoriasis.
Large improvement in public transport. Currently it's just getting worse, at least where I live, because everything is centered around cars. Thus public transport gets less funding, which results in lower quality and less people using it. Which results in more investments into car-centric infrastructure. You get the idea. The more shit it gets, the more shit it gets.
Bicycle lanes and sidewalks. Building large roads is seemingly no problem, but bike lanes and sidewalks? Nah. I could get to school on a bike, but the only way to get there would be by a dangerous busy road, so a bus it is. I am not worried about getting killed by a truck or BMW driver, I am however worried about serious permanent injuries which are probably more likely.
Is it considered a technological advancement to remove something which exists now and actively makes life worse? I'd like to remove "health insurance" as a concept