We'd have to ask the Supreme Court if that's the case and the way those "super neutral judges" act... maybe we wait until after the election for that one.
Pretty sure SCOTUS carved out the exception for only the president based on their bullshit logic that the president needs to act without waiting a few seconds to consult the president's army of lawyers waiting on standby 24 hours a day.
Wow, Democrats nominate a prosecutor, and people's thoughts on ACAB change all of a sudden and start down voting me on it. It's like they forgot the first A means All.
To be clear she's 4,000% less a bastard and than Donald Trump, that doesn't mean ACAB stopped being true, I die on this hill.
Aside from not being Trump (which is a great trait), I know next to nothing about Harris. I know she's a former prosecutor, and might be able to identify her if she showed up at my door
What else should I know about her (and should I be hopeful of her pushing any meaningful progressive policies)?
Edit: in case anyone wants to understand, which this person doesn't seem to, the problem with "you hate the cops yet you call them" is twofold:
A lot of us don't call the cops. They're useless at getting anything stopped or fixed, they tend not to care when it's reported and often will only make your life worse. However, sometimes due to how the law and money work, sometimes we have to call them. Which leads directly into...
The cops have a monopoly on the legitimate use of force. That means that anyone trying to get justice in any other way than that sanctioned by the state will be in trouble with the state. The police's monopopy alienates us from our own means of defending ourselves. We have to beg for scraps of justice from the table of our masters.