Update to Terms of Service + New Bylaws (Protections for users)
Hey all,
In light of recent events concerning one of our communities (/c/vegan), we (as a team) have spent the last week working on how to address better some concerns that had arisen between the moderators of that community and the site admin team. We always strive to find a balance between the free expression of communities hosted here and protecting users from potentially harmful content.
We as a team try to stick to a general rule of respect and consideration for the physical and mental well-being of our users when drafting new rules and revising existing ones. Furthermore, we've done our best to try to codify these core beliefs into the additions to the ToS and a new by-laws section.
ToS Additions
That being said, we will be adding a new section to our “terms of service” concerning misinformation. While we do try to be as exact as reasonably able, we also understand that rules can be up to interpretation as well. This is a living document, and users are free to respectfully disagree. We as site admins will do our best to consider the recommendations of all users regarding potentially revising any rules.
Regarding misinformation, we've tried our best to capture these main ideas, which we believe are very reasonable:
Users are encouraged to post information they believe is true and helpful.
We recommend users conduct thorough research using reputable scientific sources.
When in doubt, a policy of “Do No Harm”, based on the Hippocratic Oath, is a good compass on what is okay to post.
Health-related information should ideally be from peer-reviewed, reproducible scientific studies.
Single studies may be valid, but often provide inadequate sample sizes for health-related advice.
Non-peer-reviewed studies by individuals are not considered safe for health matters.
We reserve the right to remove information that could cause imminent physical harm to any living being. This includes topics like conversion therapy, unhealthy diets, and dangerous medical procedures. Information that could result in imminent physical harm to property or other living beings may also be removed.
We know some folks who are free speech absolutists may disagree with this stance, but we need to look out for both the individuals who use this site and for the site itself.
By-laws Addition
We've also added a new by-laws section as well as a result of this incident. This new section is to better codify the course of action that should be taken by site and community moderators when resolving conflict on the site, and also how to deal with dormant communities.
This new section provides also provides a course of action for resolving conflict with site admin staff, should it arise. We want both the users and moderators here to feel like they have a voice that is heard, and essentially a contact point that they can feel safe going to, to “talk to the manager” type situation, more or less a new Lemmy.World HR department that we've created as a result of what has happened over the last week.
Please feel free to raise any questions in this thread. We encourage everyone to please take the time to read over these new additions detailing YOUR rights and how we hope to better protect everyone here.
Simplest answer is: if you are a vegan, do not own a cat. They are obligate carnivores. There is no healthy and humane way around the fact they need to process meat to be healthy. Don't own a cat if you are vegan and don't want to feed your pet other animals.
If you don't want to rehome your cat, you will need to live with the fact that you will need to sacrifice another living mammal in order to feed your pet.
Owning a pet while vegan is already kind of hypocritical..
Simplest answer is if you eat meat, you don't give a fuck about animal abuse. You care about pet abuse, and only just enough so you don't have to research it or try. If you liked kitten steaks you wouldn't care what they were being fed because circle of life, bro. Keep on dumping meow mix into your little chonk's food bowl and telling yourself how moral you are, you brave ethical champion you.
I thought it over, and I've decided that from now on, I'll only be getting my meat from Elwood's. They're stock animals, so I don't have to worry about harming pets anymore.
Thats... disgusting but your choice, i dont care but next time keep it by yourself. Next search for cat meat. There is definitly someone selling that. ( or even human meat in the darknet ), good google search.
Its a reason of what is okay for you or not. But to straight telling anyone who eats meat is subhuman is nearly unbearable annoying of you.
Just for your next conversation(s) keep what you by yourself.
Here for your contribution to this conversation a duckass:
But to straight telling anyone who eats meat is subhuman is nearly unbearable annoying of you.
Boy, that's an absolute hell of a strawman. I'm deeply comforted that this is the sort of sound, rational thinker that the LW administration thinks should be kept on-board.
Exactly, you approve of animal abuse when you want to eat them, and oppose it only when you don't. It's a violent, sickening, and childish outlook. Goodbye.
Strange what? Why do people who call themselves Animal lovers then do such horrific things to Animals? Meat eaters, at least, don't act so snooty, they like killing and eating Animals. But these Vegan Guys? Seems like they just want to torture this poor cat. 🥸