A government hunting illegal abortions would only care about data that shows signs of pregnancy followed by early termination, random data will never match those criteria and as such is utterly useless.
Which is worse, the line on the map?
The fact that you consider the Palestinians struggling to survive in Gaza dead already.
1500 a day in October according to UK intelligence.
Trump was good at speaking to that
I don't understand this, he campaigned with Musk, flaunted the idea of offering him a cabinet position and Musk stated the people would suffer under his policies. That's about as pro corporate as it gets.
We bailed them out of TWO world wars.
And you got to profit massively off of this, with your industry in top condition while Europe was a pile of smoking rubble, allowing you to become the superpower you are today.
EDIT:
If the Europeans don’t grow a fucking pair, to hell with them.
This one's also quite ironic coming from a country whose balls are kept in a box on Netanyahu's desk.
Raise your kids to be loving, respectful people, that's the only chance we have for a better future. If we leave the future generations to be raised by people full of hate we're doomed.
The irony when abcnews just copied the AP article, this is the primary source: https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-garbage-truck-wisconsin-1b9b2882b59639ba0dc898b0b45e395b
Did you even read the article before you posted it?
Grieving murdered family and friends is political?
In 10 years time a coding assistant is going to spin up a development environment, install the necessary frameworks and sdk's, create accounts with 3rd party software providers, activate said accounts, process the payment if necessary, process the emails sent by these providers to either obtain some kind of key or download a file, then apply this to the codebase to activate the use of 3rd party tools. It's going to compile the code it generates based on a 100 page prompt, for the appropriate platforms, configure the right environment variables for the target system and create a distributable package. It's going to create accounts with 3rd party hosting providers, activate said accounts, process the payment if necessary, setup mfa authentication, setup the deployment environment, install the necessary frameworks and runtimes, upload and deploy the distributables. It's going to take customer bug reports in spoken or written form, process them, reproduce the issue and apply fixes to the codebase, verify and provide feedback to the customer. It's going to take customer feature requests in spoken or written form, process them, apply changes to the codebase and provide feedback to the customer, etc, etc, etc...
Kinda doubt it to be honest.
Fun fact any developer working with the api can tell you, there is a clear distinction between de voip bit and the meeting/chat bit. They haven't bothered rewriting or integrating it in any way so the Skype for business backend is still very much alive.
And if you're uncertain about the exact numbers always overestimate costs and underestimate income.
Tortoise by Blippi, same reason.
Gisele Pelicot said she was reacting to remarks by Guillaume De Palma – one of the lawyers for the defence – who told the court that "there's rape and there's rape" in a possible attempt to back up some of the men's claim that they assumed they were participating in a libertine couple's sex game.
Don't feel too bad for them now.
Fiat Microlino
edit: not that affordable actually for what you get.
Note that the title is incorrect, the content is about one of Harris' advisers.
Amazing how every time they designate a new "safe zone" for people to go to they're utterly incapable of stopping Hamas from setting up camp. Either that or they're full of shit.
Especially America? There are countries executing people for their sexual orientation.
Women have been beaten to death by police before for violating hijab law, I don't blame her for not stopping.
Could use that year in the headline considering the current situation.
>MR en PS hebben wél een alternatief plan om de verkeersveiligheid op te krikken. Met bijvoorbeeld hogere boetes voor wie op een parkeerplaats voor mensen met een beperking staat, of het afschaffen van de tolerantiemarges bij snelheidscontroles of meer trajectcontroles.
I wonder how many people have been injured or died by someone unlawfully parking in a handicapped spot. Not that this wouldn't be a good measure on its own.
>Ze zijn vooral bang dat ze kiezers gaan verliezen. Er sterven dus mensen op de weg, vermijdbare doden, omdat zij weigeren om maatregelen te nemen om de verkeersveiligheid te verbeteren
The article doesn't mention their official arguments against the policy, couldn't find the equivalent article on rtbf either, but it would be nice to know their reasoning to block this.
No English version on vrt yet so posting the Dutch version.
EDIT: Can barely see the quote markup so italicized as well.