If you're a Harris voter, you're the American conservative and would have voted for Reagan proudly, given that was Harris' campaign policies.
You're not wrong, greenpeace is oil funded and has always been employed to redirect environmentalism away from anything that actually hurts the oil industry.
Only as long as the centralized authority stays aligned with you. Then you have the same problem.
From your own link it's not an inherently antisemitic word, nor is it often used that way. On top of this, I wouldn't trust a genocidal hate group to define words properly. Get a better source.
Because Zionism is fascism by every possible definition that doesn't include the word Italian.
Zionists should be treated as we treat Nazis.
The lefts been doing it, I'm happy to see liberals aren't going to the FBI and police at least in this instance to stop the left like they did from 2016 to current year.
You understand that under that logic all the 'good' you want to attribute to Biden is actually because of Trump, right?
You can't argue "economic effects lag behind," and then claim Biden did good during his term.
No, most people decided neither option was good enough. Trump destroyed the economy, Biden finished it off. Harris lies to voters and said they were better off than they were under Trump, which isn't true for any group of voters.
So if Harris doesn't even see a problem, she's not going to help. Trump is a liar but at least sees there's a problem. At worst nothing changes regardless of who gets in office using this reality. At best maybe Trump accidentally does something good.
Harris, by deciding to lie about the Biden economy and ignore the economic reality the majority of Americans are experiencing, effectively eliminated herself as a candidate. She explicitly and implicitly stated she doesn't care about and will not improve economic conditions.
Harris ran the same campaign as Clinton, plus genocide. She failed worse than Clinton. It was predictable, guaranteed really.