One of the first words Japanese language learning resources teach you is the word for baseball. It's 野球 yakyuu ("field ball") btw

The recent EU elections are a pretty good reminder of this

Based and vaporeonpilled bestie

"I realize me trying to use terms I don't know the meaning of in an argument makes me look stupid now to people who actually have knowledge about the subject, so I'm going to make a short and quippy comment to avoid trying to address my incompetently made claims and hope the other person lets me have the last word, or else I'm going to continue arguing because it would hurt my ego if they got to have the last word." That is how you look to everyone else. Ancaps are very predictable. How many times have you tried to mic drop people today so far?

In my language what I said looked fine in this context and I'd be understood.

Haha no fucking way you're trying to use "in my language it's different" in this context. What language? What language could you possibly even be referring to? Is this language in the room with us right now?

Since I well know what lazy evaluations are, I am using them correctly, for the analogy that another person should have separated two arguments I've made. So it is clear for any spectator, competent or not, that you are a fool. Except some of them are the same.

You saying "I'm right and your wrong because... because I know I'm right!" is certainly an argument. I guess I was correct about you not being able to come up with actual reasoning for the bullshit you tried pulling.

I also think you are incompetent at your job, because people use informal language all the time to talk about concepts.

What kind of pseudointellectual oral diarrhea is this? "Informal language"? You think anyone actually believes the bullshit you're making up about "lazy evaluation" being "informal language" for something else in your language?

Are you in 10th grade or something? You sound so unbelievably dumb right now trying to make justifications for your stupidity up on the fly and failing horribly.

Actually whatever lemmy.world admins use to auto-ban malfunctioned and was banning a bunch of users for "URL Blacklist" coincidentally when I posted the comment. I'm glad that you thought it was a long ban though and that I wouldn't be able to respond because now I can point and laugh at what you just said

but laziness in functional programming is not limited to lazy iterators. I meant lazy evaluations, as in Lisp.

Man you really just fucking Googled "laziness programming definition" and regurgitated words from the first Wikipedia article you saw? I'm curious how you're going to try to weasel your way of of that and somehow connect lazy evaluation to however you were responding to that person. Because if you actually knew what the hell lazy evaluation was then you would know how stupid you sound right now. Let me guess, you won't even attempt to because you realize trying to explain would make you look even more clueless.

What is obvious is that you saw the words "functional programming" online one time and thought "you should learn functional programming" sounded like a fancy way of saying "you should learn logic" so you used it without having a clue as to what you were even talking about. The most stereotypical ancap pseudo-intellectualism I've seen!

LOL no fuckin way you ever learned "quite a lot of them" (not even a logical response/conclusion following the comment) and then "forgot" everything about functional programming, but randomly spouted it out because you thought it was somehow relevant. You don't know what you're talking about at all and it shows. And you're crying "other people think they're intelligent"... do you have no self-awareness? How do you rationalize that you get a pass for saying and believing stupid shit, "I know I'm right and they're wrong, science and logic says otherwise but I know that means logic is just liberal propoganda! Grrr!"

Let me guess, you coded a shitty notepad in Python one time or vaguely heard some people on r/ProgrammerHumor mention C++ pointers and Haskell and think you're a "master hacker" now. Lmao

You "meant laziness"? What are you trying to pull out of your ass right now man? Have you even touched a piece of modern technology in your life?

My entire job is using Scala, Rust, and Haskell, and I can guarantee that you have no fuckin idea what you're on about. Like what even is that supposed to mean lmfao, you think monads will save your capitalism? Will you utilize lazy iterators to destroy the left wing? Did you just want to sound intellectual by using a random math term?

I was gonna disagree, but I couldn't actually think of a functioning stateless ideology which allows private property. Anarchism is inherently for abolishing private property, so that's out already. That mostly just leaves you with "anarcho-"capitalism which is just replacing the government with an ultra-capitalist power structure and decimating social mobility, it's just an undemocratic state but shittier...

Why would we have a PM? We already have the Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader. And the PM wouldn't be able to exercise any executive powers unless you burned the constitution, because separation of powers.

There's not really a good reason to adopt a parliamentary system like the UK's for example if we were to completely reform the government imo. Or to have a PM separate from the president at all.

Every capital G Gamer is repulsed by real women, based on their reactions to realistic women in media. But they definitely aren't asexual, so logically, they're gay

Shoot them

We're allowed to kill Abe Lincoln and JFK, why aren't we allowed to kill these guys? Why does Reagan get plot armor out of all the presidents? Who wrote this shit?

To be fair JFK getting shot was pretty epic though. He almost caused nuclear holocaust (although a more rabidly anti-communist president may have definitely caused nuclear holocaust), war crimed the South Vietnamese a ton, and stabilized Israel. RFK getting assassinated was less epic because that gave us Nixon

I have plenty of WEBP and every image editing/viewing application I have installed can use it fine. Including, but not limited to:

pdn, GIMP, Krita, Aseprite, InkScape, OpenToonz, IrfanView

I think Apple users have issues with Webm & Webp? But the issue here is using Apple products in the first place. Losing 90% of basic functionality is what you expect when using one of those.

They are the strongest DRM on the market.

LMAO you have got to be shitting me. It is the bare minimum for DRM, it's weak as fuck and games protected by Steamworks DRM are cracked almost immediately by casuals

https://www.suffolkgazette.com/lost-on-the-m25/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-16193588.amp

there's a point where you shouldn't legally be able to drive past a certain age

and for people unfamiliar with the field it has always been a term synonymous with AGI.

Gamers screaming about the AI of bots/NPCs making them mad beg to differ

Do NOT use battery electric busses when you could use trolleybusses. Or even better, just use trams

That being said, anything is better than diesel busses

Lol what? How did you conclude that if 9x = 5 then x = 1? Surely you didn't pass algebra in high school, otherwise you could see that getting x from 9x = 5 requires dividing both sides by 9, which yields x = 5/9, i.e. 0.555... = 5/9 since x = 0.555....

Also, you shouldn't just use uppercase X in place of lowercase x or vice versa. Case is usually significant for variable names.

Pi isn't a fraction (in the sense of a rational fraction, an algebraic fraction where the numerator and denominator are both polynomials, like a ratio of 2 integers) – it's an irrational number, i.e. a number with no fractional form; as opposed to rational numbers, which are defined as being able to be expressed as a fraction. Furthermore, π is a transcendental number, meaning it's never a solution to f(x) = 0, where f(x) is a non-zero finite-degree polynomial expression with rational coefficients. That's like, literally part of the definition. They cannot be compared to rational numbers like fractions.

Every rational number (and therefore every fraction) can be expressed using either repeating decimals or terminating decimals. Contrastly, irrational numbers only have decimal expansions which are both non-repeating and non-terminating.

Since |r|<1 → ∑[n=1, ∞] arⁿ = ar/(1-r), and 0.999... is equivalent to that sum with a = 9 and r = 1/10 (visually, 0.999... = 9(0.1) + 9(0.01) + 9(0.001) + ...), it's easy to see after plugging in, 0.999... = ∑[n=1, ∞] 9(1/10)ⁿ = 9(1/10) / (1 - 1/10) = 0.9/0.9 = 1). This was a proof present in Euler's Elements of Algebra.