but if cheesecake factory hired him and supported him to make this discovery, you would look at the menu differently.

YOU understands it is dumb to shut them down. You are not necessarily the average green advocate. The average anything advocate / activists these days are usually much dumber than the general concerned citizens.

You gonna do better? Then go into politics. Otherwise take your pick.

Russian spies. Nice try.

Then let me ask another way, what right do you have to decide what other people may or may not want? If people are paying their hard earned cash to pay for what you and I consider shitty things, then you and I are clearly wrong.

I mean, it is just your opinion that EA shouldn't have DLC. There is no fault in buying it and there is no fault in selling it. Does it make things worse for the rest of us? Yeh it does, but really, why do you care if you aren't buying it?

Japanese?

Gullible people are partially to be blamed.

Creative passion? In mobile games? What are you on?

I mean all the shitty mobile games for the past decade or so are very much human generated garbage. What's wrong about having AI doing the repetitive work and have human do the creative part? I mean I get it that you are worried the companies are going to use it wrong, but you can also agree there are good ways to use it yes? Or you are fundamentally against using AI entirely?

Where did you get the sense SE is like that? Or their new CEO operates that way?

But why not? If an industry isn't already fully automated, AI can be considered no?

Nay

What are you talking about, we are going to breed our generation of evil motherfuckers.

You didn't know? Covid vaccine is now an annual vaccine, the new one is 2023/2024.

Do you really don't know why, or are you being sarcastic?

He said this: I have never done anything "useful". No discovery of mine has made, or is likely to make, directly or indirectly, for good or ill, the least difference to the amenity of the world.

That's in https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Mathematician's_Apology, the summary of which matches what you said:

One of the main themes of the book is the beauty that mathematics possesses, which Hardy compares to painting and poetry.[5] For Hardy, the most beautiful mathematics was that which had no practical applications in the outside world (pure mathematics) and, in particular, his own special field of number theory. Hardy contends that if useful knowledge is defined as knowledge which is likely to contribute to the material comfort of mankind in the near future (if not right now), so that mere intellectual satisfaction is irrelevant, then the great bulk of higher mathematics is useless. He justifies the pursuit of pure mathematics with the argument that its very "uselessness" on the whole meant that it could not be misused to cause harm. On the other hand, Hardy denigrates much of the applied mathematics as either being "trivial", "ugly", or "dull", and contrasts it with "real mathematics", which is how he ranks the higher, pure mathematics.

As a manager, I would ask you to file a Jira ticket first.

ChatGPT suggested G.H.Hardy.

Well no, because all the other things you do will make that face look a bit different.