They shouldn't be used as such, but frequently are. It is even more difficult to distinguish between disagreement and insufficient argumentation.

Those generalizations are harmful indeed and should not be tolerated as it breeds Us vs. Them mentality. Just asking the person not to be offended when they have every right to be with "if you are not part of the problem" is the modernized "I am not racist, but" and "No, I meant the other type of foreigners, not you". Misandry is a thing. Just because one comes from a misogynistic surrounding, doesn't mean other experiences are suddenly not real.

People bound by unhinged radical feminists, and I do mean the Crazy-Karen-On-Video crowd, mutter every other second a misandric sentence. Of course this crap erodes your self-worth. You are literally being demeaned for absolutely nothing. Speak up to shut them up. If women find the energy to speak against harmful notions like, so should everyone else, if they see inacceptably demeaning behaviour which differs fundamentally from appropriate criticism.

The issue is the tank too small, and bicycles shouldn't exist. /s

Endlich die passenden Kleidungsstücke zu Kartoffelbatterien.

About the story I doubt they could course correct in time after the botched Dawntrail writing and therefore I am not excited about in the least. The dungeons were great, judging by casual mode mechanics I hope they cook with the Alliance Raid as well and they have my faith, and the real star of the show will be the Chaotic Alliance raid. Artwork 100% faith, battle design 90% faith and story 0% faith for me.

The described issues are very different from each other. One was a fire warning and the other a stall. Not an argument against the airline or manufacturer. Just a coincidence.

I am out of the loop. What Dax?

Even then I am not sure, if it can keep up the wonder and horror. It will work only so many times.

I would love to experience the sequel like I did the original, but not sure if it is repeatable.

Artikel erwähnt keine Statistiken und Belege für die Behauptung.

The entire gambling lootboxes were massively popularized by Valve, turning Team Fortress 2 from pay2play to predatory gambling.

I once called out quite specific misandrist statements, you could assume they might have disagreed with the evaluation. Instead, they straight up jumped to calling me a dangerous misogynist when my entire political and social stance is openly opposite. In the aftermath I read on their social media increasingly unhinged rants how only single rare exceptions of men are not perpetrators. Not surprised the left alienates large demographics, even their own allies.

You absolutely need to as early as possible for a massive advantage. Pick 3 for white and 3 for black. Look for books, speak ideally to your local chess club.

I did that because the answer didn't make sense as it is an issue I just acknowledged.

You imply I think Wikipedia is per default unbiased and all truthful which it isn't and I stated clearly otherwise with "quite difficult to be neutral". So I am not sure where the misunderstanding comes from.

Bad rep for going down the personal route in a discussion.

Propaganda is communication that is primarily used to influence or persuade an audience to further an agenda, which may not be objective and may be selectively presenting facts to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is being presented.

From Wikipedia. They didn't send the message war is bad for your health like some insurance disclaimer. The selective content tries to induce fear through the incursion into Kursk and for obvious reasons would have never shown the tense situation after the fall of Avdiivka with regular territorial losses in that area. Presentation of dead soldiers is aimed at inducing an emotional response. The intent is and was foremost to demoralize the enemy. I don't think it's reprehensible in any way. Declaring a few cuts as the truth, when you could have shown the opposite with Avdiivka, should tell you that's naive. Call it what is, a Ukrainian military high jacking of Russian TV.

Your example tries to put science into this and the issue we talk about is a war between two countries. Selectively showing information is scientifically inaccurate for history and social science. Science is a way of course to find the truth in a way, but a process of better descriptions of reality.

I didn't declare a pissing contest of disinformation which Russia will win by a landslide.

And so is naming this the "truth about war".

"quite difficult to do neutral" -> "unbiased information. Dear Lord." Is your reading comprehension alright? We are talking about TV high-jacking showing some historical soviet afghan war footage and pictures of gored russian soldiers. Declaring this as the ultimate "truth about war" is hyperbolic.

It is because people think they are on the right side of politics so much, that whatever they say or do, can't be criticized to the slightest extent. I dislike the declaration of "truth" in wartime quite a lot as it doesn't seem to be sensible. The black-white thinking is an absolute cancer in this internet society as you can tell by the amount of comments thinking I would side with Russia when criticizing the wording of the article, not even the Ukrainian action itself.

They just assume whatever statement isn't in full accord with them, means you are in full accord with the extreme opposite end of whatever spectrum. I highly advise to avoid political movements and friend groups with such extreme tendencies which favor shouting down over any discussion as they will circle jerk themselves into pure insanity.