Had to look this up, because I'd seen it before but didn't want to accuse Americans of being crazy without proof:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hamburger

1 a: ground beef
1 b: a patty of ground beef

The meme says singular "hamburger", so it makes sense that they meant it in the ground beef sense. Every other dictionary starts with "a patty of ground beef" by the way, so it seems to be an American peculiarity.

I just rewatched this, including Steins;Gate 0 this time, and it was sooo good. Original was better than I remembered (almost impossible) and 0 maintained that quality for another full season.

The worst thing about it is that I can never again see Kurisu without crying, especially when she's pictured out of reach beyond Steins;Gate.

It's cute to see Marcille enjoy normal food in a normal way :3

Available image generators are already capable of generating those images and they weren't even trained on it. Once a neural network can detect/generate two separate concepts, it can detect/generate the overlap. It won't be as fine-tuned obviously, but can still turn out scarily accurate.

I don't think you even need the actual stuff to train a neural network to recognize it. For example, if I wanted to train a neural network to recognize pictures of lions, but I didn't have any actual pictures of lions, I could use pictures of lion-shaped things, lion-colored things and locations where lions might appear. If a picture is hitting all three of those, it's very likely to be a lion. Very likely is all a neural network can do, so it's good enough for my purposes.

It is a bad thing, it's not like they planned it ahead of time and prepared for the consequences of population decline. The entire system is designed around a growing population and if that growth turns negative, so does the government's budget.

I have a similar reaction, but I find it hard to explain what it is about this picture that puts me off. I think part of it is the mismatch between the highly detailed painting and the cartoony pose and expression of the girl. The way people captioned it in this comment section also reminded me of a cartoon. "You should see the other guy", sure, but if that captures the entire painting (and I think it does), why put so much effort into it? A simpler style could have conveyed the same message. And don't get me wrong, I don't think all realistic paintings are a waste of effort, but this painting isn't realistic, it's just detailed.

That saying works for trees. We didn't make trees obsolete with better technology.

And much of the PR problem is related to waste. The main push towards alternative energy sources comes from people worried about the long term consequences of burning fossil fuels. These same people worry about the long term consequences of nuclear waste production, so nuclear sabotages itself on this front.

Yeah same, we were primed by the mention of anchors and decks. And as someone who thinks ships are pretty, I really didn't see anything wrong with that interpretation. I think I've even heard butts described as the stern before.

One, I think people generally I have an innate need to produce something. We I don't want to just sit around and entertain ourselves myself, we I want to contribute. Two, I think the 40 hour work week isn't quite the right balance for me. Maybe 30 would be better for me.

It's good to learn from experiences, but it's not good to assume that your experience is everyone's experience.

There's a version of the Jerusalem Cross used by Episcopalian service members, according to Wikipedia. I'm not American, so I don't know the exact connotation of the symbol on that side of the pond, it could still be harmless. As an outsider, I'd associate it with the crusades (or the country of Georgia), but it doesn't have to be intended that way.

Now, the fact that he's a Trump appointee automatically makes him suspect, of course, but it's less like "He has a Nazi tattoo, therefore Trump appointed a Nazi" and more "Trump appoints Nazis, therefore the tattoo is a Nazi tattoo".

I didn't mind your opinion, but now I have to downvote anyway. An opinion this uninformed doesn't have any right to exist. Minecraft was the sole reason for the current generation of Java devs, it's literally the Statue of Liberty of the United Javates, the first thing those poor huddled masses saw before landing in the New World.

So clearly that language has support for methods in this context and it isn't necessary for all this logic to be mixed in with the markup. So my initial comment on this PR would be "please create a method isPostVisibleForUser(post_id, user_id)". That method could be moved to a service related to post visibility, because this seems like a common feature. Though from my experience with Angular, common features are often pulled in as whole components with markup and all, so it could be fine to couple them.

Why shouldn't you go the forest at noon?
That's when the ripe elephants fall from the trees.

Why does the alligator have such a flat nose?
Because he went to the forest at noon.

Bonus points if you space them out a bit with unrelated jokes.

She looks a lot like Kotomi from Clannad, though I've never seen Kotomi in clothes like this.

I do know much about anime and these are all mainstream anime I could think of in 10 seconds:

• wolf girl
• dragon girl
• dinosaur girl
• horse girls
• spider girl
• Interviews with monster girls
• monster girls (lewd)
• monster girls (lewder)

bestiality

They're humans with some animal features, so none of the above would count as bestiality. I don't think a fantasy involving a werewolf and a fancy dildo is anywhere near bestiality either, so maybe don't judge people for a little kink.

More at stake than Bush vs Gore? Bro forgot about the 20 year war already

My reaction when someone titles their post "Dokuro" and it isn't my favorite bludgeoning angel.

you can ask the ai for where it sourced the info, and what books to acquire.

I don't know which LLM you're using, but I haven't seen any that disclose that information. And if you ask the probable word generator, you'll just get probable words back, no guarantee that they're real sources.