You ignored any of my points and did not engage in good faith.

You expect me to act in good faith while you don't? Are you a troll?

When you don't get a response you don't like, you threaten with blocking?

You call me a child, but you tantrum and run away.

There was no game. You just struggled to make a case and dare not respond to any of my points.

Looks like you enjoy headlines "Palestinians (that could be Hamas) liberated from life" glossing over Israel's war crimes.

That is what we already get. They just abandon it after. Delivering it eventually is a novel response. They ain't a AAA company. The resources and delivery track record isn't there.

It isn't a lie then. A mere delay.

Remember, this isn't a AAA with bottomless pockets and a track record of delivery.

It already is. Unfortunately. The fixing after isn't though.

I'm not saying we forgot what they said they would do. At least they made the intention to deliver eventually. This isn't a AAA company with bottomless pockets. They overcommitted and at least tried to fix it. They didn't take folks money and run though, they delivered.

If you fire a missile, you antagonise. Have you got information on context where Hezbollah took the first action?

It's not bias if it's an actual fact.

The second I understand can be perceived as biased language.

Did the rocket fire first or did the army move first? Was the army movement against the ceasefire terms? Help me understand where you see the bias is.

Exporting. You didn't even need to click. Just read, it's in the description.

Well it doesn't matter if it exports the surplus to other states and cuts their fossil fuel usage. It means that 100% of that renewable energy was cut from fossil fuels.

There is always a need to smooth out troughs. That can be through, selling, shifting demand (cheaper tarrifs during surplus), storage or as a last resort bridging gaps with other fuels.

Let's not let perfect get in the way of good. Every tonne of CO2 out the air gives us more time and a little more chance for at risk countries to stay above water.

This needs to be a statement that fixing up your mistakes rather than abandoning is what earns respect. Well done Hello Games. A great game, getting better by the day.

You could say he's under the influence, but as much as I dislike the guy and want him to fail, I cannot discount that he knows what he's doing. He's a billionaire, that bought a media company to further his business and personal interests. Just like Bezos. He feels he swung the US election and is fuelled by hubris and self-importance. A right winger using his media company to help out right wingers. Was it his choice or a favour for Donny, who knows. I do suspect Tesla and SpaceX are going to get a nice smooth run in terms of contracts, funding and legal disputes

It's Ubuntu without Snaps and a nice DE.

Ignore people when it comes to software. Many advocate Mint. Some are lovely, some are dicks. That goes for every distro.

Only able people can decide right now. Ridiculously discriminatory and infantising disabled adults.

Is Fifa as bad as domestic abuse and your partner needing the police to be called out for their safety?

Ed's an idiot, but very different situations.

I agree with you on that.

It's very different in western countries to poorer countries where guns are readily accessible. I'm talking more in regards to suppliers than consumers. I don't believe consumers should be punished. They should get help, but ultimately you cannot always treat gangs and suppliers with love and hugs when they'd happily ruin lives for money.

Look at Mexico, Columbia, El Salvador and the problems they have dealing with drug gangs. Legalising world wide would reduce those gangs power considerably.

There is allegedly some substance in it. Folks I've talked to in the Philippines who had relatives on drugs said things did improve massively and many stopped.

Obviously looks weird from outside but it is only part of the story.

It is often needed on OpenSuse TW.

If you're enabling Snap on Mint, you might as well install Ubuntu.

Well stockholders don't have executive capabilities. The CEO is responsible. Could hold board responsible too if they knew.

That's not what is happening in here unless you have been playing ER and some woman came along and told you it could be easier and you replied with something like "yeah, fair point".

Did that happen?

Why do you feel this offends you?