As long as we reward those kinda people, rather than gruesome instant punishments, they will forever rule us.

Crimea was invaded in 2014.

Hey, do you just speak your mind with no idea of what's actually happening?

True. People out here fighting leftists like their life depends on it

Don't worry, neither does he.

It's the official reason the US vetoed the UN ceasefire proposal. I say officially because they would do so regardless but still.

Sure, that's why, not the diet Republican platform they have begging for suburban small businesses that don't fucking exist and knowing that everyone left of that has no one to vote for and gambling it will be enough. It wasn't. Multiple times.

"I don't know if I'm good or evil. Stupid words, anyway... But I'm trying to be gentle to others and hard on myself. I know how to sympathize and not judge. I try to love whoever I touch. That's the only answer I have."

• pathologic 2

Which is a lot more nuanced than the OP reply of "religion".

I would say that religious institutions allow the congregation of people and thus a congregation of thought into similar things as one another, not that religion as a whole is transphobic or something. Ain't no need to use the same kinda bigotry you hate to justify saying something so wildly vague as to be useless. Use some more nuanced and complex thoughts please.

There are plenty of atheist transphobes.

This is less how OSes evolved and more a line of your perception of Windows. Guess windows 7 was your last one.

You are maliciously attacking a largely queer community with accusations of sexual deviancy in a way that has been historically used to demean queer folk in general. You are hyper focused on that sexual aspect to the point that you believe it to be all they are to the extent to claim asexual furries compromise their sexuality in the face of the pure sexyness of the furry community. I am not willfully misinterpreting you. I am interpreting you through a lense that you find unfavorable.

You know what they say about personal experiences pertaining to a group. It's 100% translatable to the entire group. Yup. That's what they say. Even so far to remove the asexual from a furry because I guess being a furry is so sexual that it must trump sexuality.

Wild take. Bonkers even.

So you have never talked to a furry and you are just throwing wild weird sexual fantasies you made up at them? And you are confused why I am saying you have weird sexual fantasies about furries? My brother in Christ, you made up a sexual fantasy about furries and now your horny posting on main about how weird they are.

Your rephrase is a double down on your own absolute inability to tell fact from fiction. Stop being weird dude. Make a furry friend and talk to a human being Bout this shit rather than just letting your sexual fantasies about them go wild

I'm not saying this is a great way to go about change. I'm saying the Dems lost because they refused to change. You can't shame a wife vosing populace into changing, nor does fighting about it do anything. Blaming the Dems at this point is the only action that moves forward. Everything else is a waste of time and effort. Dems as in dem establishment not voters.

I know multiple furries personally who are asexual. You are speaking out your ass and fetishizing furries out of your own sexual repression.

Yeah! You know what else is weird? You. For picking out a tiny subset of an already tiny community and picking on it like it is at all the norm. I can rip out a million tiny subgroups of groups and say "group" is and always will be weird because of "insert small subgroup here".

It's like people who say "I don't like abortion because it shouldn't be used as a birth control" like bokay, no one was doing that. Why are you fucking mentioning it?

And I'm saying it's ultimately the responsibility of the party to earn votes, and they gambled on what you just said and lost. The party is ultimately the one to blame and focus on. Saying what your saying is a continued juicing of a failed campaign strategy post campaign. Do you get how that's frustrating?

Like, we are over here talking about the future and what to change, you are tossing blame incorrectly into the past out of anger instead of taking that anger and moving it somewhere it could be productive.

Now we got MSNBC hosts out here praising trump. I got libs here on Lemmy excited for mass deportation because they imagine there's a conservative who deserves it. How can you not blame the Democrats for being Diet republican and losing and then blaming queer folk for "wokifying" their party, preemptively throwing them under the bus?