I also hate that. Like, why even bother linking the article if all you're offering is the headline?

Anyways:

LONDON, Nov 26 - U.S. oil and gas producers are unlikely to radically increase production under president-elect Donald Trump as companies remain focused on capital discipline, a senior executive at Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), opens new tab said on Tuesday. "We're not going to see anybody in 'drill, baby, drill' mode," Liam Mallon, head of Exxon's upstream division, told the Energy Intelligence Forum conference in London. "A radical change (in production) is unlikely because the vast majority, if not everybody, is focused on the economics of what they're doing," he said. "Maintaining the discipline, driving the quality, driving the information, will naturally limit that growth rate." Trump, who takes office on Jan. 20, pledged during the election campaign to boost domestic oil and natural gas output. Reuters reported on Monday that his transition team was preparing a wide-ranging energy package to roll out in the first days of his presidency. The United States has become the world's top oil producer following a surge in shale oil production, pumping over 13 million barrels per day earlier this year. It is also the world's leading natural gas producer. Relaxing of land permitting processing could provide a short-term boost to production, Mallon said. BP CEO Murray Auchincloss told the conference on Monday that he looked forward, opens new tab to the Trump presidency, saying the Republican leader will help accelerate permitting time for energy projects. Exxon earlier this year completed the $60 billion acquisition of smaller U.S. rival Pioneer Natural Resources, consolidating its position as the largest shale producer. Exxon expects to grow oil production in the Permian shale basin to over 2 million barrels per day, Mallon said. "We see growth beyond the 2 million probably for a couple of years but not at that continuous same rate ... certainly up to 2030 we see it growing," he said.

A perfect 10! I'll start with the "zero"... Now the "one"...

The issue is the crop has obliterated the starting value

I live in Canada and tbh I'm with the Chad on this.

Not saying "turn off your furnace" but energy use (and cost) baloons exponentially based on how hot you have your thermostat set at. Lower your thermostat to the point where wearing a sweater indoors is enough and save money. It's not even just about the money, it'sresponsible energy usage.

And I'd be happy to subsidize the first X GJ/mo to help people keep themselves from freezing, but if people want their apartment to be the tropics that's gotta be on their dime.

Same with electricity. I'll subsidize keeping your lights on but I'm not paying you to mine crypto.

Same here.

But there is middle-ground here. My wife came from a very temperate country. She wants the thermostat set at like, 26.

I'd be happy to have it at 17 and wear sleeves indoors. 9 degrees thermostat difference makes a hell of a dent in the utility bill.

What's the difference?

Somebody has to pay the tax to get the items off the boat. Spoiler alert, everyone will pass the cost on to the final consumer.

I don't know anything about China, and I don't use votes as "I agree" so I have no idea what this is about

I mean, OP says it's satire but then says they're mocking the advice to wear hiviz. As if it isn't the law pretty much everywhere to have functioning lights on a vehicle.

They're upset that his surgeon general pick believes that vaccines are REAL.

You should read the article. They LIKE that they're seeing him surround himself with cronies. They're upset that one of his picks isn't ENOUGH of a crony.

Fake news. It was Santa's Little Helper

You don't even have to go into quantum mechanics. I vaguely recall using a real/imaginary plane with a rotating vector to do something about electricity in first year engineering?

Don't worry I'm not actually an electrical engineer.

But my point is that there are applications for imaginary numbers with very practical engineering applications. Foundational, even.

I'm guessing they maybe mean that they have a more trivial practical resolution to real numbers, in that i^2=-1?

Kinda like "yeah they're imaginary but I understand that if I hit them with a certain stick they become real"

I don't think it's wrong for people wanting designate some events as being "family only". You might want something else, and I don't think that's wrong either.

I think this is a scenario with just two incompatible but valid visions.

That being said, I align with you on this one. I just think it's important to acknowledge that it's not unreasonable for someone to prefer to not have a stranger (from their perspective) around.

If I were you, I think I'd square it w/ my wife and if I got the green light from her to tell the family that you'll be spending Xmas w/ the friend. Either on your own or with them!

Can they SEE why...

One of the most insideous and common bot karma farming techniques is to "replay" a historical post.

They'll look at a post and comments from like 8 years ago, and have one account make the post, and then have other bots copy the original top comments. Then have another set of bots post the original responses to those comments.

As a result, none of the bots look like bots... Because they're actually more accurately "ghosts" of other real human users.

So when people are talking about bots, it's not just LLMs. It's also accounts which "fill out" the space, but which are actually just airing re-runs.

Flip side of heating could be to lower the temperature of freezers. If the energy is free anyways.

Flip side of heating could be to lower the temperature of freezers. If the energy is free anyways.

Hold the power button for like 3 seconds