I listen to NPR often and I enjoy it, but it ultimately has the same problem as other mainstream outlets in that they are beholden to advertisers and, in turn, to extractors of capital. It leans left socially, but as with almost all other major news organizations, it is self-interested and will almost always support neocolonialist US practices. One tiny, not-the-best but temporally relevant example -- they have yet to call what's happening in Gaza genocide.

As someone else mentioned, there is Democracy Now!, they are viewer funded, but that is also supplemented by groups such as the Ford Foundation, which obviously has ties to capital as well. Still, Democracy Now! will give more of an "outside looking in" view of the United States.

I like listening to both NPR and Democracy Now! to hear both the US-centric (capitalist) points vs the a more global (and anti-capitalist) viewpoint.

I don't necessarily agree with the person you responded to, and I could be wrong here but I don't really think Banksy is actually invoking their copyrights, just using it as an idea to criticize private property in general. Similar to how your own "god given copyright" is in itself a criticism. It's more like, "look our property laws that are meant to protect the art-maker mean nothing to big companies. Why should the property laws that are meant protect big companies mean anything to us?"

I get how you could see it as hypocritical, but I think fundamentally Banksy probably isn't advocating for stronger copyright laws here...

You're not wrong that it's illegal or that that is part of Banksy's "gimmick". I agree with you that, legally, what they do is vandalism.

But I'd guess you're getting pushback because you seem to be defending private property, which Banksy and perhaps their more politically-knowledgeable fans, likely view as unjust on the whole.

🎶Private property's inherently theft, and neoliberal fascists are destroying the leeeeftt🎶

-Socko

35mm film with picture negatives on it

I came pretty close to buying an index off marketplace (blegh) but then I snapped myself out of it. I'm really really hoping Deckard offers some innovation over what is currently available in terms of VR, and that it is a mostly open platform.

Whew thank you. You're the only person in this thread that has actually made good points about your opinion, instead of trying to be snarky or clever with one-liners. I'm in almost total agreement with you, although I still won't condemn those types of protests. I think they are probably more harmful than useful, but I understand the place it comes from is one of frustration with the absolute ridiculousness of our world and the powers that run it. I sympathize with those types of protesters, and what I assume is their frustration with the ineffectiveness of bottom-up solutions (to me, preferred) in the face of mass contributors to the problem -- heads of government, corporations, etc.

Once again thanks for the actual good-faith and thoughtful response.

Wow you're so great! thanks to you, climate change is now a thing of the past! Oh, wait…

(obviously, in jest. that's great you do that. You probably should've said something like that to begin with)

I said: What an extraordinarily stupid argument.

I stand by that. The individual is not extraordinarily stupid. The argument is.

I think the whole point of acts like you describe show how you (people) care more about a painting than the continual ravaging of life on this planet by those who seek wealth and power.

What does the Mona Lisa matter when more and more of the worlds population is scrapping to survive under constant threat of environmental and economic collapse and war brought on by the people who host and visit such works of art.

One man has control over the widest-spanning and quickest-to-establish communication systems during natural disaster scenarios. He has previously used this control to affect military operations of sovereign nations. He also has control over one of the largest social media platforms. Now, he is in the ear of the soon-to-be worlds most powerful person. (Assuming that person isnt already him, himself.)

Get involved locally before it is too late for your community.

The Eye of the Storm, The Anarchist Response to Hurricane Helene

I'm a linux admin with very little development experience (amateur at bash scripting, did some python in school, understand the concepts of object-oriented programming, but that's pretty much it) doing rustlings in my spare time. I want to be able to contribute to open source projects and be able to understand more of the discussion in the FOSS space, but it's pretty hard to see the big picture tbh and I don't know if I'm wasting my time.

Teacher: "Slavery was bad."

Republicans: "We need to end this indoctrination of our children."

Are you an anarchist?

Jesusland makes me chuckle

It is already broken -- and he has succeeded -- is what I'm getting at. But Democrats will still try to use the thing.

I fucking hate how I agree with Jesse Watters when he says

It's also crazy that they call this guy a dictator and when he won they're like "Oh we're gonna help you transition,"

The Republican party is done with any sort of politeness or goodwill, to the point of not conceding elections. They are breaking the system and rebuilding it in the aftermath. You can't stop them from breaking the thing by using the thing itself.

It doesn’t walk in saying, “Our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution.”

Yeah but evidently it does, and people still choose it.

Happily -- I hope you have a great day:)) thanks for engaging, I'll see you when the great appropriation occurs

Look at how upset you are! lmao. bro we're in political memes, take a chill pill.