Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ℛ�
ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃 @ name_NULL111653 @pawb.social
Posts 1
Comments 1K
The Great Republican Political Strategy of Insult Puerto Rico for Some Reason
  • You've got þat backwards... Þorne is þe unvoiced letter, as in þem or boþ, whereas eð is þe voiced, as in faðer.

    Source: A semester of Old West Norse language class (wherein þorne and eð are used in the same way as in English).

  • Oklahoma seeks to buy 55,000 Bibles – exactly like the ones Trump is hawking
  • And the Satanic Bible of course. And Nietzsche for the atheist philosophers, prose and poetic eddas for us heathens, some text or another for Wicca, and a Latin edition of Ars Goetia... right? No? Then I smell religious favoritism worthy of the supreme court.

  • I'm sure the women will be so very sad
  • I think the mistake might come from a lack of reading. The contraction "should've" is often used in speech, which might be mistakenly written as "should of" if you don't read a lot and see it written properly all the time. We've mostly lost the voiced quality of "v" at the ends of words like that, so it's basically pronounced "should-uf" in American English.

  • Time for it
  • Not quite an aneurysm, just a misplaced comma and some absent quotes.

    Translated:

    If the whole world went by the "it takes a village to raise a child" theory, and children were raised not by the individual but by the world as a whole, what would the world look like?

  • I probably got this rule from 196
  • Of course I don't think it was written by an actual terf. But very similar things are often said by them, and I think there is a place for using satire like this. Satirical comics have been used in countless other political issues for hundreds of years (just look at the comics similar to this against King George). Why is it any different or any more "arrogant" in our case?

  • I probably got this rule from 196
  • And in a way, yes, "spite the haters" is a big part of it. Because the "haters" are in most cases actively abusing or discriminating against us, and we generally like to bring attention to such social issues. That's the point of political comics. I'd hardly call pointing out evil people and bringing them up as a joke "arrogant."

  • I probably got this rule from 196
  • These people exist. I've met them, my friends have met them, and I personally have been abused by them. This is not a strawman argument, it's a snarky comic aimed at real people who have hurt people like me. I don't see why attacking those people is "arrogant and attention seeking." Were not pretending to be victims, we're attacking people who have hurt us through humor and snarky remarks... a perfectly reasonable response I'd say. I also apologize for assuming you're one of those people, I was quick to jump to that conclusion when it looked like you were defending such actions...

  • My rant against Christian doctrine - The people aren't the problem...

    So, with family anyways, despite all outside appearances Christians don't 'hate' a child who turns away. They still love the kid, but their religion teaches them that if they truly love them, they must do anything to make them come back to their religion - even abuse them hoping the kid breaks down and 'repents.' That's how twisted their doctrine is. It makes them commit atrocities in the name of love. And they're blind to it, because even when others point out how evil their abuse is, the doctrine teaches them that others will call "'good' (abuse) evil and 'evil' (acceptance) good." They truly believe they're helping. They believe that if their child is 'going to hell,' any amount of trauma and abuse with even a chance of preventing that is justified. It's not the people, it's the ideology. The very fundamentals of Christianity justify literally anything to convert a soul. It is fundamentally evil, all the way back to the moment Jesus died. Anything that claims to be better is no longer Christianity.

    My source: The story of my life. A story of abuse and pain, of seeing my loving mother become a monster when I left the church. Forcing me to leave my unbelieving friends. Controling every part of my mind and beliefs to 'save' me. And seeing the atrocities that I committed under that same doctrine, and how I was blinded by it.

    This needs to end. Christianity must end. The problem isn't the people - it's the doctrine. And until the moment that Christan doctrine is destroyed forever, it will never cease to turn more innocent, loving people - even my own mother - into monsters blinded by their evil.

    12