Nit-pick? That's what you are doing with the article
lead poisoning becomes evident pretty early though doesn't it? (With respect to kids)
I would think that the ratio of persistent exposure to unsafe level has got to be easily higher in cases like Flint than any fluoride-in-the-water usage. Just speculation on my part.
What measures are taken to avoid screwing up the dosage, anyone know? Maybe predilute so that an oops requires multiple buckets instead of vials?
Who's profiting off of putting flouride in the water? What is this flouride industry making money hand over first?
Atoms with three protons are oxygen
Bro, one of us is confused
What would be the training data then?
be bankrupted by a chronic medical diagnosis
That's where my mind went too
You have a point that there's a huge difference in the life of a minimum wage family and a family able to invest 6 figures. Context matters though and I think the point was that they didn't have an overwhelming amount that can force success; we're talking about a financial-secure and supported start that enables pursuit of things that are unlikely to pan out. Still no small luxury, by any means.
even if mathematically their finances are closer to minimum wage earners than to the 0.0000001% of ultra wealthy.
FWIW 0.1% is already 38 million dollars (net worth, US, 2012 data).
E: Speaking of context, you were specifically talking about commonality between the, idk, bottom 1-10%, top 1-10%, and (whatever is ultra-wealthy). So my point may be the one made out-of-context.
Well now I'm just confused. Is there another word that fits the description besides hoe? Is there a magical synonym for hoe that works for both mankind of the word? Cause that would be damn interesting.
Host server difference makes more sense though, doesn't it...
when my social lights are out they turn them on again
Why the torture?
I wonder how light-handed you'll have to be to keep that market, election, and war info accurate.
You're just throwing shit at the wall man. You slap together strawmen in the form of a rhetorical question assigning a obviously weak position to the other commenter, over and over again. Why?
They weren't defending the targeting of civilians in WWII.
They weren't arguing that Hamas is not antisemitic.
They weren't claiming Hamas is brave or pure in spirit.
They don't claim Hamas has justification.
They don't justify acts of destruction and terrorizing Jewish communities.
On and on and on. Do you always operate this way?
I miss forums. Not that they disappeared completely but that used to be the go-to for good info. Still is maybe, cause I've read through a lot of garbage trying to learn about something pretty simple and then hit a forum post that's like "well it depends if it's early- or late-season blight". What? The twenty garden blog posts I studied never mention such a distinction. But there's Jimmy in Mt Carmel Indiana breaking it down.
Lol, thought that was just a pet name for a second there, poopkins
I liked you in skinny Pete. I think that's what it was called. And I think it was Margot