Being endorsed by people vs actually implementing a platform are entirely different things
Trump was endorsed by all Nazi and white supremacist groups. That's irrelevant with our conversation
Trump wants to enact Project 2025. That's Trump's platform
No, that's just one of those sayings that goes around. It's the assumption that people make more money as they age thus causing them to be more conservative. Maybe this was true in the 80s
That stuck out the most
Thank you for trying, I hope it ruins him too
Bro same. I once asked why people seem to dislike .ml users, a genuine question, and got downvoted lol
How was it tyrannical, and what rights?
Also, define the word tyrannical
Wow that's crazy, thank you and the other person for informing me
Yikes! Thank you for writing this out, I had no idea. Fk those .ml tankies
Is there a reason people seem to not like .ml? I only joined because it said the instance was for FOSS enthusiasts
Gives big "both sides are bad" energy
The only appropriate response
I'm saying if we had a majority before Trump installed his, then we wouldn't be where we are. Woe wouldn't have been overturned either. At least it would have been a big enough stopgap to ensure the 14th amendment would have been correctly followed
Plus, even if we had 100 justices, then so be it, we have 100 but at least we'd have the majority. It's worth having a "childish" number of justices to prevent Trump
True. But if Obama picked people, at least we would have had enough to offset the loons Trump put on
Agreed, but because he didn't, now we have this outcome. It would have been worth risking a civil war to ensure America stays a democracy. The military was always on the left side, anyway
Yeah, that's why Obama should have packed SCOTUS, fuck the optics and just do what's right. We saw this coming and still Democrats assumed terrible people won't be terrible given the chance
The 14th amendment should have been the end of Trump, period. But Democrats don't want to look partisan and now look where we are.