Re verification per AP,

The amendments passed on Friday bolster privacy protections. Platforms would not be allowed to compel users to provide government-issued identity documents including passports or driver’s licenses, nor could they demand digital identification through a government system.

So it sounds like an ID will not be a requirement.

I suppose a face scan is possible, but I find it unlikely. Obviously if it heads in that direction then the law should be amended to clarify that is also not acceptable.

In terms of selling information I assume that just clarifies the status quo and isn't new. Not that that makes it acceptable, it just means that's something to tackle.

The last racing game I played was 10+ years ago, Need for Speed Underground. I really enjoyed it. Would I enjoy this?

What if my coping mechanism is denial, which means I believe it to be healthy because I'm denying the negative?

Oh I agree. I wouldn't want a stronger law. I'm just not too concerned with this one. I think if there are concerns with social media we should discuss how to solve them for everyone.

We generally say 16-21 you are an adult so fuck it, whatever happens to you is your fault and ignore the predatory nature of organizations.

We should outline the specific concerns and determine what, if any, steps we can take.

As an example, gambling. I think it's fair and reasonable to allow gambling. I think ensuring gambling isn't predatory is a reasonable limitation. I expect for most people it isn't a problem but I think providing help to gambling addicts is also reasonable. Social media should be viewed through a similar lens.

A hunting club which is permitted by state law, "to serve beverages of a refreshing nature."

Moe's got too fancy.

I mean YouTube has educational content, but that is far from its primary purpose. Assuming YouTube is completely unrestricted it wouldn't be hard for Facebook to add enough content to be arguably educational.

Hell plenty of people use TikTok for educational reasons. I'm not saying it's right, but you could argue TikTok is educational in the same way you can argue YouTube is educational.

Now if YouTube is forced to classify it's educational content the same way they classify children's content (aka poorly), maybe that'll work.

the rules are expected to apply to the likes of Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok, per the Prime Minister.

Sites used for education, including YouTube, would be exempt, as are messaging apps like WhatsApp.

The law does not require users to upload government IDs as part of the verification process.

Sounds like a pretty weak law. It will require a birthday when creating an account and accounts under the age of 16 will be restricted/limited. As a result users (people under 16) will lie about their age.

Companies don't like this because it messes with their data collection. If they collect data that proves an account is under 16 they will be required to make them limited/restricted. However they obviously collect this data already.

I wonder if Facebook and other apps will add/push education elements in order to become exempt.

What about days when I change timezones?

That is the scene we are in, but Moe is up to a lot more this episode.

I mean technically if we're going that route you could also pick off a few "troublesome" justices as well. I'm just not sure holding a gun to everyone's head is a good path to go down.

Not that I'm happy with the path we're heading down as is.

It's not that the deal will only last 60 days, just that they have 60 days to move everyone back and out of the aggressive range.

Realistically it's just boilerplate language. It's 60 days to pack up and go home, which is perfectly fair and reasonable.

Of course in reality this might just be a short reprieve. While both sides might be quiet for the next 60ish days (which is good), they might be right back at it for a variety of reasons, including the change in US leadership.

Doesn't that mean you were invited to a Google Meet via phone number? Basically someone "dialed" the wrong number. Just call in and play fart noises, I'm sure someone will figure it out.

Oh resin! That's what it was.

I didn't realize the SP didn't have a microphone jack. Luckily Nintendo learned from their mistake since they had a headphone jack on the,

• Gameboy Micro
• Nintendo DS
• Nintendo 3DS
• Switch

Keep in mind his birth was live. They said by random chance in the film, but I suspect they induced labor and this was something like a post-Superbowl event that was hyped up.

So even if the show got boring, everyone would have been aware. So maybe you are just flipping through the channels (as was the style at the time), if the baby shows up you might watch for a few minutes just to see what it's up to.

Remember Reddit had that hotdog in gelatin? I'd want to check in on that every few months.

The first few years were probably inexpensive and eventually things would get interesting.

Damn wiener kids.

That's the A plot!

It is starting to rain, but I can hardly be blamed for that. Correct!

(But what is Homer up to?)

I was stunned. Mr. Genie? I assumed Frinkiac was wrong but I pulled it up on the Disney+ and it's true.

I'll meet you at Rancho. Correct!

Which, funnily, are probably the bots you'd be fine seeing.