Unwarranted? They literally asked "don't you think he should have beheaded her too?". I gave in and replied.
To me it sounded as if you weren't sure about what happened. In my opinion he should have decapitated neither regardless what happened but where's the fun in that?
This shit is exactly why I can't watch "romantic" comedies. Too many of them solely rely on stupid misunderstandings like that.
Sytems that don't receive security patches anymore well deserve that title. You'd hardly keep it airgapped if you care about Steam updates.
Well, obviously gay. He preferred impressing the boys over the girls.
To make a point you'd have to choose something we apparently can afford. What you describe is that we're essentially broke and really can't do anything about climate change.
Serious question: Does it have any relevance whether or not someone secures majority of the public vote? Other than debunking Trump's landslide rethoric, I mean.
Thank you. While in the context of fission both the risk and the amount of waste seem to be much lower and waste can probably be managed by fission related protocols, my comment was too grossly wrong, so I just deleted it.
Her wearing a bra even before having a bite suggests that too.
The picture shows cooling towers (which could be anything) and a Tokamak reactor. Fusion doesn't produce any nuclear waste. Doesn't work either though, unfortunately. Any time now...
Sure. Or it's just tiredness and completely normal to happen.
Sure just if fully given in this way it’s basically the same as an 11 character password.
Only of the attacker knows whether it's a password or phrase. I'd argue that passwords are far more common and that's what a cracker would focus on first.
should be resistant to attacks even if there is perfect knowledge of how it was generated
As far as I know there still is no way to create actual randomness. You'll still have some pseudo-random number generator and a hopefully unguessable seed. If you have "perfect knowledge" about that, cracking the password is almost trivial.
I'd even argue that 10 as it started out was the best since xp
How can you so batantly skip over Win 7? I've heard some argue 10 was better (it wasn't) but that 7 >> XP was pretty undisputed.
All three are shit compared to Linux, of course (Arch btw).
2000 was the first Windows with an NT kernel that was really usable on the desktop. Some may argue NT 4 but in 2000 almost everything worked as expected. XP was clearly better of course.
But you're right - ME was actually a successor to 98 and XP was the joint successor to 2000 and ME.
Win8 was really damn annoying to use without a touchscreen
So many people say that but I actually liked the menu. It opened very fast and you could far more quickly find and hit the right tile than that stupid nested programs tree that was the norm in the start menus of earlier Windows versions.
I'd say considering that telemetry started to creep in primarily with Win 10, 8 was indeed better (meaning less bad).