Do you consider yourself unemployed? I'd say you aren't if you are already hired for the next job.
Correct, you can have a PhD and be a NEET. What matters is that you are currently unemployed, and not studying/training either.
Brave is malware that should never be used. If you need a Chromium based browser, Vivaldi is a good choice. Otherwise Firefox.
Which is how I learned about Lemmy. I opened Boost one day and was like... Wait, something's off. : )
Lol you are giving Musk way too much credit. No it wasn't the plan. But that's what it ended up being used for.
It's a shorthand for writing this:
variable = if (input != null) input else default
This is equivalent:
variable = input ?: default
"Show all posts from newest to oldest" is an algorithm.
"Shows random 10 posts, unordered" is an algorithm.
It's not possible to show a list of items without an algorithm. You may of course take issue with what the algorithm is, but you can't not have one.
Because it's not one. Ternary operator is A ? B : C, Elvis operator is A ?: B. The same two characters are involved, but both the syntax and effect is different.
The process of throwing ideas back and forth usually doesn't include just choosing one, but generating ideas as jumping off points, usually with some existing concept in mind. Talking with friends, looking at other projects, searching for inspiration online and in the real world, and now also generating some more ideas with an LLM to add to the mix. Using one source and just picking a suggestion probably won't get you a good result.
Can't agree
And yet virtually all of software has names that took some thought, creativity, and/or have some interesting history. Like the domain name of your Lemmy instance. Or Lemmy.
And people working on something generally want to be proud of their project and not name it the first thing that comes to mind, but take some time to decide on a name.
Off topic, but it always felt weird to me that "collaborator" is a negative term, but "collaboration" is generally positive.
Yes, but for some tasks mistakes don't really matter, like "come up with names for my project that does X". No wrong answers here really, so an LLM is useful.
I'm not saying ignore it, it's a valid reason to not like the game, like any other subjective reason.
I'm saying calling the game "Pokemon with guns" is dismissive of what the game is. It's like calling Minecraft "Rust with animal husbandry", which completely misses what the game is about.
People say "Pokemon with guns" as if that was some kind of core gameplay. You can play through the game without ever using them. It's a small feature, that absolutely is there, but reducing the game to that is missing the forest for the trees.
It's an open world crafting base building game to enjoy with co-op, that has catchable creatures like Pokemon. There is no Pokemon game that fits this niche. The guns are not important to what the game is.
Yeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
Fair enough. Yeah, I never thought of open and closed source as two exclusive options, but two of many.
I myself publish an application which isn't open source, but I publish the source code, as I believe my users have the right to know what runs on their computer, and have the freedom to audit, modify, and compile their own builds if they so wish. But I don't want someone to take and resell my application. I have yet to encounter someone calling my app closed source, but I can see how someone could.
I am not in the US. But the purpose is gaining credit score and rewards, at no cost.