Nonsense. This law will generate revenue as we fine the ever-living-shit out of social media websites until they can figure out how to get kids off their toxic platforms.

Honestly, who gives a shit. Literally no one should be using these brain-rotting democracy destroying websites anyway. If you want your privacy get a life.

Everyone in this thread must be like 12 years old judging by these hysterical responses.

So we should legalize stabbings because otherwise people will turn to “even worse” forms of violence? Surely there must be a simpler and less moronic approach to legislation.

First of all, fifteen year olds don’t give a shit about political “news.” Secondly, is your argument that Facebook shouldn’t be banned because something else just as bad as Facebook exists (which could also be banned)?

So you admit this is a good start? 4chan isn’t particularly popular anymore, btw. I’m guessing that’s why it flew under the radar.

Wow, you’re saying that vile piece of shit did something good for once? Maybe he’s having regrets about the fraying social order.

So… it’s harmful to everyone, especially kids, which is why we shouldn’t ban its use by kids?

So your complaint is the bill doesn’t go far enough? It should ban more things?

I work with young men on a daily basis and all I can say is: holy shit finally. You guys don’t understand what it’s like out there. 16 year olds are dumb as shit by default, so imagine what happens when you add Joe Rogan and Andrew Tate. Please. Imagine what it’s like to explain for the hundredth time why human trafficking is actually bad, and feminism isn’t evil, and so on. I just can’t imagine ANY FUCKING REASON that a child needs to be on a social media website of any kind, from twitch to twitter.

The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.

He’s right.

Fun fact, incense is worse for you than second-hand smoke. Stick a cigar on there next time for health purposes.

Exactly. It’s hard to be sure whether someone is delusional or just a fascist.

Fair enough. Thank you for the explanation! I’m not from Australia and I could only dream to have a bill like this in the US.

I’m still trying to figure out why people in this thread are defending much, much higher caps on donations.

Many of the parties I voted for are harmed by letting that limit be so high.

The limits are currently MUCH higher. This bill is serious progress. That’s my point.

It was a good example. I appreciate it. I provided one as well elsewhere in this thread.

I think that while the US military sucks, it’s not at the level of the IDF.

I approve of this example. Thanks!

Not this decade

So, no?

I can answer for you. The US betrayal of their Kurdish allies was evil and that was fairly recent.