Rusty @lemmy.ca This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions 🍇and 🍍.
71 0 ReplyBmeBenji @lemm.ee golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
29 0 ReplyRavenFellBlade @startrek.website IMSA kid?
1 0 Reply
myslsl @lemmy.world Those are backups in case the other functions break down.
5 0 Reply
🏳️⚧️MiaCD🏳️⚧️ @lemmy.blahaj.zone 🍊 isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
48 0 Replykjaeselrek @lemmy.ml But what if it was grown in Europe?
25 0 Replyswab148 @startrek.website Naranja
15 0 Replyfinitebanjo @lemmy.world So to clarify, definitely European and not African?
4 0 Reply
dalekcaan @lemm.ee Americans will use anything other than metric
4 0 Reply
ganoo_slash_linux @lemmy.world Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people
39 0 ReplyAatube @kbin.melroy.org "sup" without a "\" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrödinger's TeX
34 0 Replyfinitebanjo @lemmy.world I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.
25 0 Replyitslilith @lemmy.blahaj.zone Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce 🍇 and🍍?
19 0 ReplyRhaedas @fedia.io I can answer the question. No.
20 0 Replyyeahiknow3 @lemmings.world He’s right.
6 0 Reply
RandomWalker @lemmy.world Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet they’ll feel real embarrassed about that one when they’re falling asleep years from now.
18 0 Replymyslsl @lemmy.world Christ, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
6 0 Replysomeacnt_ @lemmy.world I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
3 0 Reply
LifeLemons @lemmy.ml I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
8 0 Replywisha @lemmy.ml AlligatorBlizzard @sh.itjust.works Thanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
4 0 Replylad @programming.dev Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving 😅
1 0 ReplyBjörn Tantau @swg-empire.de Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
1 0 Reply
RandomVideos @programming.dev 🍊🍊🍊🍊
By using 🍊 to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
6 0 Replywisha @lemmy.ml yeahiknow3 @lemmings.world The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.
4 2 ReplySepulchravesLibrary @lemmy.world Nyar!
1 0 Reply