The only bad thing Bill Gates ever did was say that poorer countries needed to pay for Covid vaccines. That was horrible and he backed off.

Almost all his other shenanigans was being a Billionaire stealing from other Billionaires.

People forgot that IBM was a monopoly worse than Microsoft. People forgot that Netscape was a billionaire backed corporation. MS stomped on some little guys too like Stacker. But it was someone who made $100M on a good idea and thought they could milk one idea forever.

To put Bill Gates in the same category as Musk is like saying Biden is the same as Trump.

It's ok, but those a and b buttons will look comically small next to my Duke.

He might try but Don Jr will be snorting it faster than the factory could add it.

And no one in the mainstream media will care.

Being lightly scripted, drama would be easy to add:

Oh no, the mom put the baby on the counter near the stove with boiling water!

If you don't like how voyager does some things, fork it to add your own ideas. It's faster than starting from scratch.

"Examine policies"

That assumes the politicians are telling the truth.

If you go by what a politician tells you they are going to do for you, you end up voting for Trump.

I think it's designed that way because Sales VP's get bonuses based on new sales, not retention.

So there is an unspoken market force that causes service companies to churn customers. Senior executives want you to leave because the competition is doing the same thing.

All competing companies sales teams benefit from churn as long as all companies work to alienate their customers and make them switch services.

When I ran an isp I had a customer complaint about new sales being cheaper than loyal customers get forwarded to me. I realized my mistake and cut prices across the board so loyal customers paid the same as new promotions. But very large companies are an old boys club. The CEO isn't going to piss off his VP of sales so the game goes on.

I didn't read the article or your reply, but in the spirit of Thanksgiving, I'm going to tell you you don't know what you are talking about.

Article summary: Ewoks: A Star wars comedy for children.

"There’s a right way and a wrong way to express your views in our country, and turning to violence and destruction of property is not the right way.”

Unless you are the President of the United States.

Let’s get tactical about this. Here are three ways to break free from the super-saver trap:

What? Is the media trying to get boomers to juice the economy at the expense of 0 inheritance for their children?

And to continue that analogy- Twitter didn't assign the name, the user created it so they hold copyright on the name.

Gee wizz, I don't think you understand Capitalism at all. Musk gets the profits and you get the liability.

Maybe not Pokemon but if you have a Roger Maris baseball card, you'll definitely be set for life in the future.

It's anti free market.

Conservatives invented cancel culture with cancelling the Dixie Chicks. "It's a free market! You can't tell anyone what to buy!"

Liberals agreed and stopped buying products by bad people.

Conservatives, "NOT LIKE THAT! CANCEL CULTURE IS ONLY FOR CONSERVATIVES!"

Lemmy.world does censor it.

I've heard it's not Trump himself selling them just one of his dickriders with his backing.

That's Trump's entire business model.

He didn't write the Trump Bible himself.

Small things can only fit in small cars?

That's why I think the creator might be hoping to get paid for his work if he can get the publisher to re release it.

He can't release it without being sued. But if it was leaked, he wouldn't be responsible. They can only sue the torrents' hosts and downloaders.

Whatever happened to that guy that completely remade H&R in a modern engine but couldn't release it because of copyrights.

Did it ever get leaked onto torrents?