So.... they banned social media for a whole 15 seconds?
No, he looks forward to using me as a target for their collective derision.
Yes. Humans.
Sounds like those who've seen it still don't know any more than you do.
Can't wait to hear the explanation for the "unconstitutional" claim.
Did you even read the article - particularly the part (and a further linked article) about that asshole Robby Starbuck (name now forever ruined for me)?
I think the problem lies in the very heart of what it means to be conservative or liberal. Conservatives tend towards group-think because they're either bullies, or the bullied. Liberals - by the very definition of the word - are a much more widely varied bunch that understand & respect other people's right to have a difference of opinion. Therefore it's much more difficult to achieve a unified front on the left than it is on the right. This is why the right dominates our lives so much despite being in a relative minority.
To be fair, that IS why they exist, after all. That's why it's important to have regulations imposed by whatever authority so that they ALL have to honor certain minimum expectations of decency - you can't reasonably expect any business to have expenses geared towards doing "the right things" that their competitors don't also have to abide by. This is part of what the government is there for, and these assholes insist upon removing those guardrails just to squeeze out another few million dollars they don't actually need.
Money. Money changes EVERYTHING. - Cyndi Lauper
*whew!* My pleasure!
IMHO, most anyone posting selfies are looking for attention. There's nothing wrong with that (provided it's not overboard) because I think many of us don't really get enough mutual affection or appreciation in our lives. I might be doing so myself if I hadn't had experiences at a fairly young age that caused me not to trust most people until I get to know them reasonably well. Insecurities are a bitch, so if I managed to ease yours - even if only momentarily - just by saying what I thought when I saw your picture, then I'm glad I could do that for you.
🫂
Exclusive: president-elect’s team planning for background checks to occur only after administration takes over bureau
It blows my mind that there are no legal blocks in place to prevent this (yeah, I know it's because this shit was so unthinkable that nobody prepared for it). This yahoo is on a mission to destroy EVERYTHING America was supposed to stand for. SOMETHING has to be done to stop this shit!
Company will no longer consider race and gender when making offers to suppliers and will remove LGBTQ+ merchandise
Republicans: the party of freedom, my farking ass.
Not really part of this community - just browsing through "all" - but I hope it's not inappropriate for this somewhat older straight guy to say you look cute. Here's hoping you have the best of luck with your journey.
Watch Trump get sick again like he did with COVID, and spread it to his entire transition team. They won't learn a damned thing from it, but it'd be hilarious nonetheless.
That's actually how I took it at first, seemed highly apropos.
It otter be a dog.
TL;DR version: use the right's own tactics against them.
I so wanted them to attempt a connection between Diana Muldaur's TOS & TNG characters. Alas...
You're dependent upon the recording you're listening to having been set to a decent volume to begin with. I will occasionally come across videos or music with significantly quieter sound than usual. I know what a good volume for my need at the moment is, while this warning is a dumb automatic pop-up based solely upon the single factor of the master device volume control setting - without any consideration for the actual decibels being output.
I think you took it way more offensively than it was intended.
There are exceedingly few phones that have them anymore - particularly more powerful ones. I prefer a headphone jack because I don't have to juggle keeping everything charged long enough for when I want to use it.
A prime example is when I go to sleep. I live on a somewhat busy street in an apartment facing said street. I have noisy neighbors. My spouse is used to sleeping with the TV on (there are reasons for this which I understand) - thankfully, the screen doesn't have to be on. As such, I use wired earbuds that block out most external sound, along with an audio track I've been using for many years on a loop to put (and keep) me to sleep. Show me any wireless earbuds that'll last the night, block out sound, and not be too big to lay upon comfortably since I'm a side-sleeper (let alone not have controls accidentally activated by laying on them).
ETA: Never mind that my Bluetooth earbuds always seem to develop a problem keeping contact with their charge contacts in the case before long, so it's not infrequent that I go to use them and they're dead when they shouldn't be.
Elon Musk and Trump adviser reportedly clash over cabinet picks
X owner and adviser Boris Epshteyn reportedly came to blows over how much influence each exerts on president-elect’s choices for top administration jobs
Frankly, I hope Elon wins this one. His handling of Twitter demonstrates his incompetence, and his inability to keep his mouth shut will be helpful in preparing to fight whatever BS they're up to next. The other guy might be too smart and sneaky considering his involvement in the fake elector scheme.
Is it possible to use an Android device entirely verbally - i.e. as a "black box" (without touching or looking at it)?
Google's "Voice Access" is decent for controlling the device through verbal commands, but you have to be looking at the screen to get results - it won't read anything back to you.
Google's "TalkBack" will read things on screen to you, but you have to interact with the screen physically (never mind the significant change in how interactions work - which I understand the need for - but it's still a serious mental PITA to switch between the two interaction methodologies frequently).
Is there no way to just interact with it entirely verbally? A (very) simple example of what I'm looking for:
- "What are the current Google News headlines?"
- Starts reading each one aloud, along with the names of the sources.
- "Read the article about Trump caught making out with Elon from AP News."
- Proceeds to load the article & read it aloud.
(Yeah, I know there are podcasts for this - it's meant to illustrate the basic idea of completely verbal interaction with the device, not be an actual problem I'm looking for someone to provide a solution to.)
It just seems to me that we should be able to do this by now - especially with all the AI blow-up over the past couple of years. Can anybody point me to a usable solution to accomplish this?
TIA.
EDIT: I thought of a better example (I think), because it occurred to me that the above one could (sort of) be done with a Google Home speaker. I'm looking to be able to interact with Android apps verbally wherever possible, so my better example is "What are the latest posts made to the 'No Stupid Questions' community on Lemmy?" So far as I know, Google Home is not able to do such a thing. I'd like to tell Android to open my Lemmy client and start reading post headlines until it hit one I wanted to have it open & read to me.
I'm basically looking to use apps verbally to fill in gaps that Google Home/Assistant don't cover.
EDIT 2: Here's an even better, more universally applicable description of what I'm after - copied from a response I gave to another comment:
Imagine someone doing some relatively mindless menial job such as working an assembly line, janitorial work, chauffer - something where your mind is relatively unoccupied, but you're not free to look at and/or touch your device (whether it be due to practicality, or job rules). While doing that job, I want to be able to have the device read and interact with something of interest to me at that moment (ADHD is a fickle mistress), rather than just relying on podcasts with predefined content. Kind of like having someone next to me doing all the interfacing between me and the device.
EDIT 3: I added a comment with some news on options that may come close enough to doing the job which I've come across since posting.
BI: AOC asked voters why they backed her candidacy and Trump's reelection. They said the economy and Gaza.
I've often assumed Harris didn't want to insult her boss by going against him, because I got the impression she was planning to give Netanyahu what for once she took over - especially with him escalating things further and further. Did anyone else get that vibe, or was it just wishful thinking on my part?
OPINION: Think you know how bad Trump unleashed will be? Look at the evidence: it will be even worse
The last time was awful, but now that seems a mere dress rehearsal. From a public health crisis to the end of Nato, the threats are clear, says Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland
It “poses a credible risk to public safety,” report says.
> People are calling for violence against FEMA on TikTok and X, new reports say.
I seriously don't understand why these people aren't immediately tracked down and arrested for terroristic threats. This BS is way beyond any reasonable "free speech" limit.