I'll be honest, this is the first I'm hearing that Time's person of the year isn't a celebration of a given year's most positively-influential person. Granted, I don't read Time, but I don't think it's all that common knowledge that "person of the year" isn't always a compliment. I mean, I've seen several of "___ of the year" awards, and most ended with applauding and rewarding the winner; if Time wants people who don't read it to know that its award doesn't follow common conventions, it should probably title it something to obviously differentiate itself.
I'd have to have created a Twitter account at some point for that...
But if someone did have one, they should just delete it.
A steady stream of farewells would give them something to unite over and talk about.
Just fucking delete the account.
I don't know why everyone has the obsession with "winning" by getting a last word in like that.
If you want to piss people like this off, just ignore them. They're literally throwing tantrums for attention, and people really think giving them attention is a positive.
You think "later loser" would piss Elmo off, but that's what he wants.
TImes described Hitler as "the greatest threatening force that the democratic, freedom-loving world faces today." They didn't think he was a good person
It could be...but it's supposed to be the most newsworthy/discussed person. Doesn't necessarily have to be for negative reasons. Greta Thunberg was Times POTY in 2019. Last year was Taylor Swift and before that was Zelensky.